Fine Tuning Polymer Nanocomposite Interpenetration
Polymer nanocomposites are used in a wide range of applications, from automobile parts and tires to high-tech electronics and solar cells. And just like traditional composites, the properties of nanocomposites can be tailored to the requirements of specific applications.
But achieving those properties can be challenging.
Arthi Jayaraman, associate professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Delaware, says:
“The goal is to be able to control and tune how the nanoparticles arrange themselves within the polymer matrix. By controlling and tuning how well the nanoparticles disperse or aggregate in the polymer matrix, we can tailor the macroscopic properties of the resulting nanocomposite.”
Dispersion and Aggregation
Jayaraman is part of a research team that recently detailed new science about the behavior of polymer-nanoparticle composites, a discovery that translates into unprecedented abilities to control and tune dispersion and aggregation.
Jayaraman explains that if nanoparticles are simply added to a polymer, they tend to aggregate rather than to disperse. One way to promote dispersion is to coat or graft the nanoparticles with the same polymer as the matrix.
“People have been using chemically identical graft-matrix polymer nanocomposites for awhile,” she says, “and the physics that governs nanoparticle dispersion/aggregation in such nanocomposites is now well established, both experimentally and theoretically. However, there are synthetic difficulties in achieving the conditions that lead to particle dispersion.”
Graft Polymer And Matrix Polymer Chemistry
So instead of using nanoparticles and a polymer matrix with similar chemistries, Jayaraman, her graduate student Tyler Martin, and her experimental collaborator Ramanan Krishnamoorti at the University of Houston decided to see what would happen if they chose graft polymer and matrix polymer chemistries that would attract each other.
“Our hope was that this attraction would increase interpenetration of the matrix polymer with the graft polymer on the nanoparticle, stopping the nanoparticles from aggregating in the polymer matrix and enabling us to achieve better dispersion,” she says.
The interpenetration of the graft and matrix polymer, called “wetting” in the nanocomposite field, promotes dispersion, while its opposite, dewetting, leads to aggregation.
Both are desirable depending on the required properties, but the team’s innovation of using mixed chemistries challenged the established science, which said that both wetting-dewetting and dispersion-aggregation were synonymous and were “either-or” phenomena.
“What we found is that while dispersion-to-aggregation represents a sharp change between two states, the transition from wetting to dewetting with mixed chemistries is actually a gradual change,” Jayaraman says. “Our finding opens up the potential to tailor materials through various stages of wetting or graft-matrix polymer interpenetration.
We’ve basically discovered that the tuning knob is a lot finer than we initially thought.”
Top Illustration: polymer nanocomposite simulation shows a polymer grafted nanoparticle in a chemically distinct matrix (blue spheres represent repeat units in the graft polymer chain, yellow spheres represent the nanoparticles, and green spheres represent repeat units in the matrix polymer chain).Credit: University of Delaware